Recycled Green Waste

Many have questioned the sustainability of current ranching methods. Much of the ranching industry today is based on a system of cheap fuel, feed, and labor, that has not existed for 60 years. It is my belief that more livestock could be finished locally on GREEN WASTE. Every area of the country has some sort of agricultural waste product that rather than being discarded could be recycled and fed to animals to produce high quality nutritious meat. Such items could include rotten or unused vegetables, fruit and orchard waste, brewer’s grains, nut byproducts, grain products like stale bread, restaurant waste, and whatever unused commodity byproducts are locally available and currently not being used. These items could come from restaurants, food processing facilities, grocery stores or from farms utilizing byproducts or products unfit for human consumption. I think it is about time we value what we have locally available and find appropriate uses for it.

As corn finds other uses and fuel becomes a bigger and bigger expense it becomes increasingly economical to switch to local remedies. Often commodity wastes such as pumpkins in November after Halloween have no use and simply are left to rot. Pumpkins are excellent livestock feed and there are a dozen examples similar to that in every county in the country. Finishing animals locally gives land owners with small parcels opportunities to enter a high profit margin low volume business. Getting waste products dramatically cuts feed costs for the animal and has the ability to produce a very fine quality meat product. My wife and I have been raising steers like this for the last few years for our own freezer and have had great success.

Clarification for "anonymous"

My comment "Scientific data tells us we should be lowering consumption" was directed towards environmental and eventual economic issues. I am not educated in nutrition and cannot argue the pros and cons of meat consumption in regards to health. I am inclined to agree with your post though. I wonder what the impacts of reduced subsidies to CAFOs and Big Ag will be. There is a great chapter in "State of The World 2006" called Rethinking the Global Meat Industry.

double post

*edit*

Works for chickens.

Long ago my grandfather and I would hope in the old '59 Chevy truck and head to Albertsons. He had worked out a deal with the green grocer there to haul away boxes of "expired" green goods. He would feed this to our chickens as a supplement to their grain diet. It was economical, healthy and saved on GHGs that would have been used to transport the waste or to grow the extra grain the chickens would have eaten in place of the green food. One question though. How does the water supply apply to this? Beef requires a huge amount of water to produce and takes a large toll on the environment in so many ways (I understand this other method could potential decrease some of those degredational effects). Would this not strengthen the movement to increase meat consumption when all scientific data tells us we should be lowering consumption?

Little regard for quality

I would strongly argue that science does not clearly show health benefits in lowering consumptions of meat. I would say that it may point to eating better sources of leaner meat and eating fewer meats that are not finished on a corn diet. One of the problems with the current commodity structure in this country is that it does little to reward producers for making better quality healthy livestock. This has led to a product which has become cheaply produced and in many ways become devoid of many health benefits.

Post new comment

Anyone can post a new comment without registering. Your comment will go to a moderator before it is posted. We encourage you to sign your comment.

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <a> <em> <i> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.